Entries in graphic (2)

Tuesday
Oct272009

Really

A Northwest flight crew overflew their destination by 150 miles recently.  Rampant speculation in the first reports were that they had fallen asleep at the wheel from possible overwork.  It turns out they were so engaged with their laptops that they lost all track of time and responsibility.  Really.  Several hundred people on board and you decide it's more important to check out a scheduling system and lose all track of what's really important.  Like landing! Because you really have no choice but to come down!

Downtown Petaluma, 2009I travel over a 100,000 miles a year and stories like this are getting disturbing.  We've got enough of an issue throughout society in the all important things that we call ourselves.  But at some point the selfish behavior needs to stop.  Like when peoples lives could possibly be on the line and a careless disregard of the rules leads to gross negligence.  

Reports say that these pilots had unblemished records and no safety issues had ever been recorded.  That may be true.  But it would have been a real tragedy if they had flown into another aircraft, a building or something else. Would it have been possible for them to run out of fuel altogether?  The mind spins at the possibilities.

This photograph has nothing to do with this post.  It's a building in Petaluma and I'm a sucker for the old and tired looking places.  This is an old grain building that's been turned into something else but I thought it was graphic and looked good.  So sue me.  And forgive me for a blatant rip-off of Saturday Night Live although, I have used that expression long before I saw the skits.

Saturday
Sep052009

Alcove in Laguna Beach

Alcove, Laguna Beach, 2009Or this could be called: Large Format Success... Finally!

The Chamonix is proving to be more of a beast than I initially thought.  The difficulties stem from the fact I don't get it out enough but this image is from a stack of negatives I developed this week that, in all honesty, I had put off simply because I thought they would not be worth much time and effort.  

I had worked this scene for a good two hours.  The movements, upside down backward image, and static nature of composing the image are not yet second nature to me.  I exposed four sheets of film that day and used the Efke simply because it's cheap, and I had a box of it that needed to be used.  I really thought of this an exercise and wanted to get out and photograph one early Saturday morning.

So I decided to mix up some chemistry a few evenings this week and develop the film not expecting much.  But I saw this come out of the fix and thought I might actually have something.  I have to air dry the negatives so I waited patiently to see if my initial thoughts were, indeed, correct.  

The raw scan looked like crap.  This is Efke 25 and their quality control is less than stellar but somehow it works for me.  It's got an old feel to it that I really like.  Combine that with the fact that I got the composition correct and I've got a large format image I'm proud of, finally.

It might have been sharper but the more I look at it the less I think so.  I need to print it out to make sure but I think it will look even better on paper.